Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Witless at the White House

I don't know about the rest of you, but I've about had it with this Times Select bullshit. I am a subscriber and it took me 20 minutes to finally get access to the editorials. So, as a mini-protest, I'm offering you some stuff for free.

First...here's Maureen Dowd's editorial about the cluelessness of the Bushes -- especially Karen Hughes, the newly crowned Queen of American Bullshit. Not only is she clueless, she refuses to talk to anyone who might disagree with her.


Dancing in the Dark
September 28, 2005
The New York Times
By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON


I can't wait to see what's next.

Dick Cheney carpooling downtown with Brownie? Rummy Rollerblading down the bike path to the Pentagon? Condi huddling by a Watergate fireplace in a gray cardigan?

Maybe now that our hydrocarbon president is the conservation president, he'll downgrade from Air Force One to a solar-powered Piper Cub as he continues to stalk the Gulf Coast towns and oil rigs like Banquo's ghost.

The once disciplined and swaggering Bush administration has descended into slapstick, more comical even than having Clarence Thomas et al. sit in judgment as Anna Nicole Smith attempts to get more of the moolah of her late oil tycoon husband.

We've got the clownish Brownie still on FEMA's payroll, giving advice on cleaning up the mess he made. ( Let's hope the White House is paying him only long enough to buy his good will, not to take any of his bad advice.)

We've got two oilmen in the White House whose administration was built on urging us to consume and buy as much oil and energy as possible. Now they're suddenly urging us to conserve. (Since Mr. Cheney considers conservation a "personal virtue," at least he'll get some virtue.)

The president called on Americans to drive less, and told his staff members to turn off their computers at night, turn down the air-conditioning, form carpools and take the bus.

At the same time, he set a fine example by wasting gazillions of gallons of fuel with all the planes and Secret Service vans and press motorcades and police escorts that follow him around every time he goes on one of his inane photo-ops from the Colorado bunker to what's left of the Mississippi Delta and the Bayou. He did his part by knocking off a few cars from his motorcade on his seventh trip to the gulf yesterday - but if residents had hoped he'd bring them some water, they went thirsty.

"Even so," as The Times's Elisabeth Bumiller wrote, "security dictated that Mr. Bush's still-impressive caravan pick him up at the base of Air Force One in Lake Charles, La. - and drop him off just yards away for a meeting with local officials at an airport terminal."

Noting that the Bush administration has proposed new fuel economy standards that critics say could make huge S.U.V.'s and pickups even more popular, Reuters published some arithmetic about the president's notorious fuel inefficiency.

Air Force One costs $83,200 to fill up and more than $6,000 per hour to fly. Then there's the cost of helicopters and a 2006 Cadillac DTS limo that gets less than 22 miles per gallon.

Karen Hughes, the Bush nanny who knows nothing about the Muslim world and yet is charged with selling the U.S. to it, wasted even more fuel this week flying to Saudi Arabia to tell women covered from head to toe in black how much she likes driving even though they can't.

She knows so little about the Middle East that she looked taken aback when some Saudi women told her that just because they could not vote or drive did not mean that they felt they were treated unfairly.

One thing Saudi women like even less than not having certain rights is to have hypocritical Americans patronize them.

The moment when America should have used its influence to help Saudi women came on Nov. 6, 1990, as U.S. forces gathered in the kingdom to go to war in Iraq the first time. Inspired by the U.S. troops, including female soldiers, 47 women from the Saudi intelligentsia took the wheels from their brothers and husbands and drove until the police stopped them.

They were branded "whores" and "harlots" by Saudi clerics, had their passports revoked, and were ostracized from society for a dozen years. Even their husbands suffered.

The experience made them more angry at the U.S. than at their own rulers. They feel that the Bushes play up the repression of women in the Middle East when it suits their desire to bang the war drums, but do not care what happens to women once the ideological agenda has been achieved.

They feel the administration and the American media have emphasized the repression of Saudi women post-9/11 as a way to demonize Saudi Arabia and paint Saudi men as bullies and terrorists.

When Ms. Hughes goes to Saudi Arabia to introduce herself as "a mom" and to talk about Americans as people of faith, guzzling fuel all the way in a country getting flush selling us oil, I think we can consider it taxpayer money well spent.

W. doesn't really need to worry about turning down the lights in the White House. The place is already totally in the dark.

9 Comments:

At 10:20 AM, Anonymous liz said...

THANKS!!! for the posting of Maureen's editorial --- the NYTIMES is driving me nuts!

 
At 10:22 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

M.D.

She's the best!

 
At 12:29 PM, Blogger Thomas said...

I have had an intellectual crush on Maureen ever since I started subscribing to the NY Times.

 
At 2:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tnx uniongirl. I love M D too. BTW I was a union organizer for 6 yrs. Got shitcanned by my BA for bringing in too many members, ya know, doing my job. Go figure.

 
At 2:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice to read Maureen again, if you go to jail I'll send you a letter!

 
At 9:13 PM, Anonymous Indict-O-Rama said...

Thank you for posting MoDo, I must admit I hijacked your link to somewhere else too. Thanks again.

 
At 9:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

BLESS YOU!

 
At 1:41 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks for the link (from Americablog comments)!!!! You Rock! :-D

 
At 8:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey-thanks-I immediately hit "unsubscribe when the NYT decided they needed to charge me to read krugman, hebert & dowd. Hey, they and rich are a great read, but the paper is a sinking ship, with a contemporary record not unlike its past history-in other words, more myth than real! Generally, an organ for government propoganda...

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home